Civil liberties during war-time Essay

Civil Liberties argon for use license of speech and freedom of the shove as defined by the first amendment. These freedoms take been challenged by the threat of warfare, but should they be taken remote because of it?The first amendment states that relative shall put forward no law respecting an insane asylum of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise hence or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a make up of grievances. These are our civil liberties that we are promised as citizens of the U.S.In the past these liberties have been interfered with. The primary(prenominal) cause for this interference was war. The government precious to abolish any chances of treason or leaking of information to the enemies and to do this they passed act much(prenominal) as the disaffect and Sedition Acts. The Alien and Sedition Acts make it illegal to write, print, speak, or publish anythi ng false or fictitious about to United States.We can recognize how certain precautions must be made to insure safety in clock of war but to go so far as to take away our freedoms are out of bounds. There are numerous former(a) ways to make us safe without interfering with our liberties. For example tighter pledge. After 9/11 security became very tight at airports and other areas where terrorists might be able to land the country. Although this extra security was tedious and while consuming to get through, it was well indoors the lines of the 1st amendment because it did not take away any of our freedoms.I do not believe that our civil liberties should be taken away during wartime. This is a democracy and should stay put one whether engaged in war or not. The government can conjecture of more ways to protect us other than limiting our freedoms of speech or of the press, and certainly without interfering with our privacy unless thither is just cause to do so.